ekkert rusl? djöfulsins kjaftæði
Þetta sýnist mér mest vera tekið beint uppúr myndinni “in plane site” sem er bara brandari, yfirfull af kjaftæði og mistúlkunum.
http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/3208/yourownevidence4dt.jpghttp://69.57.144.30/ats/pentagon757/rim1.jpglendingabúnaður 757:
http://69.57.144.30/ats/pentagon757/landinggear002.jpghttp://www.news.navy.mil/management/photodb/webphoto/web_010911-N-6157F-001.jpgfrom the film:
How does a plane 125 ft. wide & 155 ft. long fit into a hole which is only 16 ft. across
[rebuttal: the hole is about the diameter of the fuselage of the plane. None of the “no plane at the Pentagon” theories analyze the fact that the building had been massively reinforced, and the physics of the crash were not those of a normal building.
“Here is the hole in the building - it's been reported by at least a dozen different sources (including conspiracy theory sites) to be a 16 to 20 foot hole. That is really interesting when you take into account the fact that the 757 body is 12 ft 4in wide and 13 ft 6in high. (Here is where I was mistaken in the past, like so very many others I was led astray by the HEIGHT of the aircraft, which is actually the measurement from the wheels-down to the tip of the tail. That measurement is for aircraft hangar clearance, not the SIZE of the aircraft.) The 757 is basically a cylinder that is 13 feet across. It then should not be surprising that it would create something around a thirteen foot hole in the side of the building.”
Look at the nose-on view of a 757 - you can see the body is slightly less than 1/3 the size of the height of the aircraft. The tail certainly isn't going to punch a hole through a reinforced concrete wall; that is why there is no 40 foot hole in the front of the Pentagon in any photos. A 40 foot object didn't hit it, a 13 foot object did.