Rakst á góðan fyrirlesturn um ofangreint efni

http://mirror.fem-net.de/CCC/26C3/mp3/26c3-3501-en-why_net_neutrality_matters.mp3

svo er vídeó (Why Net Neutrality Matters?) af fyrirlestrinum í listanum hérna http://events.ccc.de/congress/2009/wiki/Conference_Recordings

Þetta fjallar m.a. smá um pólitíkina á bakvið þau öfl sem hafa sameiginlega hagsmuni af því að cappa netið hvort heldur sem það er í formi takmörkunar á bandvídd, aðgengi að efni, skerðingu réttinda eða afnáms á frelsi.

samrunar netfyrirtækja (færri og stærri), sívaxandi hagsmunatengsl afþreygingarefnis iðnaðarins og netveitnanna, bandvíddar svelti (sbr rafmagns sveltis taktík sem Enron beytti*) fyrir hugmyndir um forgangsröðun bandvíddar þar sem fjársterkari netnotendum er hyglað á kostnað venjulegra netnotenda.

Höfundar, börn og sjúklingar eru m.a. nokkur dæmi um fórnarlömb vonda netsins sem lobbíistum þessarra hagsmunaaðila þykir auðvelt að nota á fáfróða og tæknihefta stjórnmálamenn í hinum og þessum löndum.

höfundar útaf allri þeirri “óheftu”(frjálsu) gagnadeilingu sem á sér stað milli notenda netsins = Takmörkun Niðurhals. Börn vegna alls þessa frjálsa vals sem netið veitir notendum netsins = Netsíur og Eftirlit. Sjúklingar vegna skurðaðgerða sem framkvæmdar eru á milli landa yfir internetið = Forgangsröðun Netumferðar og svo hverjar aðrar falskar forsendur fyrir frelsissviptingum netnotendar þeim getur dottið í hug á næstu árum o.s.f allavegana skoðið bara videóið það upplýsir um hluta af þessum blekkingarleik sem risafyrirtæki einsog AT&T er mikið í mun að virki.


* California's deregulation and subsequent energy crisis
See also: California electricity crisis

..Senator Phil Gramm, the second largest recipient of campaign contributions from Enron, succeeded in legislating California's energy commodity trading deregulation. Despite warnings from prominent consumer groups which stated that this law would give energy traders too much influence over energy commodity prices, the legislation was passed in December 2000.

As Public Citizen reported, “Because of Enron’s new, unregulated power auction, the company’s ‘Wholesale Services’ revenues quadrupled—from $12 billion in the first quarter of 2000 to $48.4 billion in the first quarter of 2001.”[10]

Before passage of the deregulation law, there had been only one Stage 3 rolling blackout declared. Following passage, California had a total of 38 blackouts defined as Stage 3 rolling blackouts, until federal regulators intervened in June 2001. These blackouts occurred mainly as a result of a poorly designed market system that was manipulated by traders and marketers. Enron traders were revealed as intentionally encouraging the removal of power from the market during California's energy crisis by encouraging suppliers to shut down plants to perform unnecessary maintenance, as documented in recordings made at the time.[11][12] These acts contributed to the need for rolling blackouts, which adversely affected many businesses dependent upon a reliable supply of electricity, and inconvenienced a large number of retail consumers. This scattered supply raised the price exponentially, and Enron traders were thus able to sell power at premium prices, sometimes up to a factor of 20x its normal peak value.